1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 698 F.Supp.
  5. 698 F.Supp. 1504 (1988)
 

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE v. HALL

No. C88-384Z.

698 F.Supp. 1504 (1988)

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE and Suquamish Indian Tribe, Plaintiffs, v. Colonel Philip L. HALL, District Engineer for the Seattle District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers; John O. Marsh, Secretary of the Army; United States Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers; City of Seattle, a municipality of the State of Washington; Elliott Bay Marina Group, a partnership; and David M. Abercrombie, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle.

On Determination of Bond and For Temporary Restraining Order July 11, 1988.

On Motion for Reconsideration September 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Otsea, Jr., Laura Ann Lavi, Office of the Tribal Atty., Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Auburn, Wash., Phillip E. Katzen, Alexandra Harmon, Evergreen Legal Services, Native American Project, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

Susan Barnes, Asst. U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for Colonel Philip L. Hall, John O. Marsh, U.S. Dept. of the Army Corps of Engineers.

G. Richard Hill, John McCullough, Foster, Pepper & Shefelman, Seattle, Wash., for Elliott Bay Marina Group.

Judith B. Barbour, Seattle City Atty., Seattle, Wash., for City of Seattle.

Mair, Abercrombie, Camiel & Rummonds, Seattle, Wash., for David M. Abercrombie.

Mason D. Morisset, Terence L. Thatcher, Pirtle, Morisset, Schlosser & Ayer, Seattle, Wash., for Tulalip Tribes of Washington, amicus curiae.

Richard S. White, Helsell Fetterman Martin Todd, Seattle, Wash., for Homeowners, intervenors.

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

ZILLY, District Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion of plaintiffs Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and Suquamish Indian Tribe ("the Tribes") for a preliminary injunction enjoining the construction of a 1200-slip marina, the Elliott Bay Small Craft Harbor (the "Marina"), pending trial of the merits in this case. The Tribes contend that a preliminary injunction is necessary because construction of the Marina...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases