1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 697 F.Supp.
  5. 697 F.Supp. 1474 (1988)
 

RANDLE v. LaSALLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

No. 86 C 3290.

697 F.Supp. 1474 (1988)

Casell RANDLE, George Austin and Holmes Communications, Plaintiffs, v. LaSALLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., d/b/a Chicago Cable TV, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

October 14, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Pincham and Anthony DiVincenzo, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

James Betke, Julie Badel, McDermott, Will & Emery, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, Holmes Communications (HC), Casell Randle and George Austin, brought this action against the defendant LaSalle Telecommunications, Inc., d/b/a Chicago Cable TV (LaSalle), alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1981 and pendent state claims for breach of contract. LaSalle has moved for summary judgment on all of the claims. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).

I

On 16 March 1984...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases