KABUSHIKI KAISHA HATTORI SEIKO v. REFAC TECH. DEV.

No. 87 Civ. 7891 (MGC).

690 F.Supp. 1339 (1988)

KABUSHIKI KAISHA HATTORI SEIKO trading as Hattori Seiko Co., Ltd., Plaintiff, v. REFAC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Refac Electronics Corporation and Refac International, Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 21, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blum Kaplan by Lawrence Rosenthal, Harold I. Kaplan, Matthew W. Siegal, New York City, for plaintiff.

Cobrin & Godsberg, P.C. by Peter T. Cobrin, Abby Avroch Ross, New York City, for defendants.


UNSEALED OPINION

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff and defendants have cross-moved for summary judgment in this action, which turns on the construction of a patent licensing agreement. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment is granted and defendants' motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Kabushiki Kaisha Hattori Seiko ("Hattori") is a trading company engaged in the distribution and sale throughout...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases