NEWCOME v. ESREY

No. 87-1603.

862 F.2d 1099 (1988)

Vaughan S. NEWCOME, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. Jack ESREY; Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided December 16, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Bullene Throckmorton (George W.R. Glass; Scully, Throckmorton & Glass, on brief) for plaintiff-appellant.

Arthur L. Smith (Peper, Martin, Jensen, Maichel and Hetlage, on brief) for defendants-appellees.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

Vaughan S. Newcome appeals the district court's dismissal of her securities fraud action against A. Jack Esrey and Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. (the brokers). Newcome based her federal claims on section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), as well as section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and the corresponding Securities Exchange Commission regulation, rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases