1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 681 F.Supp.
  5. 681 F.Supp. 1045 (1988)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

681 F.Supp. 1045 (1988)

R. Stockton RUSH, III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC., and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 8, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Lovell, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff.

Gold, Farrell & Marks, New York City, for defendant Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.; Martin Gold, of counsel.

Shanley & Fisher, New York City, for defendant Scott Seskis; Matthew Farley, of counsel.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. ("Oppenheimer") and Scott Seskis ("Seskis") (together, "Oppenheimer") have moved for an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) setting aside the jury verdict received January 21, 1988 and compelling arbitration of all of plaintiff R. Stockton Rush's ("Rush") claims. In the alternative, defendants have moved for an order granting a new trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases