1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 524 So.2d
  5. 524 So.2d 1173 (1988)
 

DISNEY v. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC.

No. 87-1781.

524 So.2d 1173 (1988)

Barry DISNEY, Individually, B. Disney International, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and Micro Computer Consultants, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellants, v. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC., Barad Holding Corporation, and Arnold Barad, Individually, Jointly and Severally, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 25, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin Quittner, Plantation, for appellants.

Peter S. Roumbos and Elliot S. Shaw of Taplin & Howard, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

After review of the record on appeal we conclude that the trial court did not err in finding, pursuant to section 78.067(2), Florida Statutes (1987), that it is reasonably probable that appellee is entitled to possession of the disputed IBM equipment. Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., DOWNEY and STONE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases