Following the rendition of final judgment in this protracted school desegregation case, five separate interveners, each allegedly representing widely divergent viewpoints, sought an award of fees and costs pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CRAWFORD v. BOARD OF EDUCATION
200 Cal.App.3d 1397 (1988)
246 Cal. Rptr. 806
MARY ELLEN CRAWFORD, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent; BUSTOP et al., Interveners and Appellants.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 5, 1988.
May 5, 1988.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Maiden, Rosenbloom, Wintroub & Fridkis, Maiden, Rosenbloom, Wintroub, Vogel & Fridkes, Cliff Fridkis, Miriam Tigerman Vogel, Harvey Saferstein, Jack D. Fine, Tuttle & Taylor, Raymond C. Fisher, Wayne Stephen Braveman, Richard B. Wentz and Lawrence B. Trygstad for Interveners and Appellants.
McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, G. William Shea, Peter W. James, Michael M. Johnson, Lisa F. Hinchliffe, Jerry F. Halverson and Richard K. Mason for Defendant and Respondent.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.