U.S. v. PEMBERTON

No. 87-1060.

853 F.2d 730 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert B. PEMBERTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 3, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Metzger, Sausalito, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

John Stephen Graham, and Dorothy Nash Holmes, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SKOPIL, NELSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Robert Pemberton appeals his conviction on one count of conspiracy to possess more than 50 kilos of marijuana for sale and on three counts of using a phone to facilitate a narcotics offense. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 843(b) (1982). He argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of conspiracy, that the district judge erred in instructing the jury, and that his conviction should be void because of alleged outrageous conduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases