1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 850 F.2d
  5. 850 F.2d 650 (1988)
 

PITTS v. TURNER AND BOISSEAU CHARTERED

No. 86-2442.

850 F.2d 650 (1988)

Dr. Robert E. PITTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TURNER AND BOISSEAU, CHARTERED, Lee Turner, Eldon L. Boisseau, Hal D. Meltzer, John L. Carmichael, Deborah L. Carney, Casey Law, Cynthia G. Barrett, Interstate National Insurance, Maginnis and Associates, Robert T. Stephan, Harold S. Youngentob, H. Phillip Elwood, Arthur E. Palmer, Edwin D. Smith, and Justice B. King, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 5, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred W. Phelps, Jr. and John R. Balhuizen of Phelps-Chartered, Topeka, Kan., for plaintiff-appellant.

Jeffrey Jones of Sloan, Listrom, Eisenbarth, Sloan & Glassman, Topeka, Kan., for defendants-appellees Turner and Boisseau, Chartered, Lee Turner, Eldon L. Boisseau, Hal D. Meltzer, John L. Carmichael, Deborah L. Carney and Casey Law.

William Scott Hesse, Asst. Atty. Gen., Topeka, Kan., for defendants-appellees Cynthia G. Barrett and Robert T. Stephan.

Robert J. Perry of Marshall, Hawks, Hendrix, Schenk & Nichols, Topeka, Kan., for defendants-appellees Interstate Nat. Ins. and Maginnis and Associates.

Alan P. Blinzler of Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Overland Park, Kan., and Williams H. Sanders, Sr. of Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for defendants-appellees Harold S. Youngentob, H. Phillip Elwood, Arther E. Palmer, Edwin D. Smith and Justice B. King.

Jerry R. Palmer, Topeka, Kan., for defendant-appellee Cynthia G. Barrett.

Martha Coffman-Gallagher, Lawrence, Kan., for defendant-appellee Casey Law.

Before ANDERSON, SETH and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

SETH, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 34.1.8. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is an appeal of the district court's dismissal of appellant's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2), 18 U.S.C. § 1961,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases