1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 849 F.2d
  5. 849 F.2d 593 (1988)
 

A. STUCKI CO. v. WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 88-1063.

849 F.2d 593 (1988)

A. STUCKI COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 8, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond G. Hasley, Rose, Schmidt, Hasley & DiSalle, Pittsburgh, Pa., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was E. Wallace Breisch.

Charles G. Hileman, Schnader, Harrison, Segel & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Bonnie MacDougal Kistler.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge, and BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

A. Stucki Company (Stucki) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 83-5340 (October 28, 1987) (Broderick, J.), granting a directed verdict to Worthington Industries, Inc. (Worthington). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In 1976, Railroad Dynamics, Inc. (RDI) filed a declaratory judgment action against Stucki, seeking a declaration that Stucki's U.S. Patent No. 3,837,292 was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases