IN RE APPLICATION OF G & B ANDERSON, INC.

No. 86-1811.

38 Ohio St. 3d 96 (1988)

IN RE APPLICATION OF G & B ANDERSON, INC. FOR CONTRACT MOTOR CARRIER PERMIT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 3, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gurney, Miller & Mamone and Jeffrey W. Brader, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Robert S. Tongren, Elizabeth H. Watts and James B. Gainer, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

The first issue before us is whether the PUCO as a matter of policy must consider the adequacy of existing motor carrier service in determining whether to grant an application for a permit for contract carriage by a private motor carrier.

Anderson contends that the PUCO unlawfully refused to grant the requested permit even though Anderson's application satisfied all the requirements set forth in R.C. 4923.07 for obtaining a contract motor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases