1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 838 F.2d
  5. 838 F.2d 404 (1988)
 

U.S. v. WHITNEY

No. 85-5129.

838 F.2d 404 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard WHITNEY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 5, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hochman, Salkin & DeRoy and Richard Marmaro, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Nancy Stock, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion published at 785 F.2d 824 (9th Cir.1986) is amended. Changes are made in the section, "II. Discussion" as follows:

A footnote is added following the first sentence in the second paragraph:

"1 This case is not decided under the Victim Witness Protection Act (see particularly 18 U.S.C. § 3580(d)) that sets forth in detail procedures for issuing orders of restitution...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases