1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 50 Ohio
  5. 50 Ohio App. 3d 69 (1988)
 

CITY OF DAYTON v. McLAUGHLIN

No. 10650.

50 Ohio App. 3d 69 (1988)

CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLEE, v. MCLAUGHLIN, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County.

Decided July 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent Popp, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Kurt Portmann, county public defender, for appellant.

FAIN, J.

Defendant-appellant, Chuck McLaughlin, appeals from his convictions and sentences for violating Sections 91.50(A)(5) and 91.50(B) of the city of Dayton Revised Code of General Ordinances ("R.C.G.O."). These sections pertain to an owner permitting a dog to bite another, and an owner keeping a vicious dog, respectively. With respect to the first charge, McLaughlin had interposed an affirmative defense based upon the victim's having been unlawfully on his property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases