1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 847 F.2d
  5. 847 F.2d 325 (1988)
 

U.S. v. CURRO

No. 86-2028.

847 F.2d 325 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William CURRO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 26, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Perez (argued), Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellant.

Keith E. Corbett, Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., Samuel Rosenthal (argued), Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MARTIN and GUY, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSTONE, District Judge.

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Curro, was convicted of engaging in a racketeering enterprise, 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4), as well as various other related substantive offenses. On appeal, Curro claims the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the grand jury testimony of a witness who was deceased at the time of trial. Curro also claims the court erred in admitting certain co-conspirators' statements. Upon a review of the record, we find no error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases