Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
There is no merit to defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him of burglary because the testimony of the accomplice was not sufficiently corroborated. Even without the testimony of the accomplice there was ample evidence which, when viewed as a whole, was sufficient to connect defendant with the commission of the burglary (see, CPL 60.22 [1]; People v Moses,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.