BAHR v. CITY OF LITCHFIELD

No. C9-86-1757.

420 N.W.2d 604 (1988)

Eugene BAHR, et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF LITCHFIELD, et al., Petitioners, Appellants, Charles Schrum, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 18, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven E. Drange, Litchfield, for City of Litchfield.

Ronald C. Anderson, Willmar, for Charles Schrum.

Robert D. Schaps, Litchfield, for Eugene Bahr.

Stanley G. Peskar, Thomas L. Grundhoefer, St. Paul, amicus curiae, for League of MN Cities.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


COYNE, Justice.

We granted the petition of the City of Litchfield and the Litchfield Police Civil Service Commission for further review to address the question of the requisite notice to commence the 60-day limitation period during which a writ of certiorari may issue to review a decision of a civil service commission. Minn.Stat. § 606.01 (1986). In reversing the trial court, the court of appeals held that the statutory time period does not begin to run until...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases