Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
The State argues on appeal that the court erred in awarding consequential damages to claimant after finding that claimant's property had increased in value after the taking. While the State is correct that consequential damages are improper where the value of the property after the taking is greater than before the taking, since the value of benefits is deducted from any consequential damages (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.