KRULL v. CELOTEX CORP.

No. 86-2919.

827 F.2d 80 (1987)

Edward F. KRULL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 13, 1987.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 26, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Connelly, Chadwell & Kayser, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellant.

Terrence M. Johnson, Terrence M. Johnson Law Office, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CUMMINGS and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, Senior District Judge.


CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

In this case we must consider under what circumstances a court may issue a written opinion elaborating on a prior order after a case has been dismissed and a final judgment entered. We conclude that where a court merely memorializes a previously rendered order within a reasonable time and without significantly altering the substance of that order, the subsequent written opinion may be considered as nunc pro tunc and thus within the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases