duPONT v. BRADY

No. 1043, Docket 87-7198.

828 F.2d 75 (1987)

Eugene duPONT III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward J. BRADY and Brady & Tarpey, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided September 8, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Schoeman, New York City (Thomas J. Dolan, Schoeman, Marsh, Updike & Welt, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Anthony P. Colavita, L'Abbate & Balkan, Garden City, N.Y., for defendants-appellees.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, and KEARSE and WINTER, Circuit Judges.


WINTER, Circuit Judge:

The principal issue before us, one of first impression, is which party bears the burden of persuasion on the issue of a plaintiff's reliance or nonreliance on a defendant's material omissions under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (1982), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1986). We conclude that, once the plaintiff establishes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases