HUTCHINS v. HUTCHINS

No. 85-1834.

508 So.2d 391 (1987)

Kenneth B. HUTCHINS, Appellant, v. Charles T. HUTCHINS, et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Rehearing Denied June 3, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hal K. Litchford and Robert W. Burijon, Jr. of Litchford, Christopher & Milbrath, Orlando, for appellant.

Patricia Fields Anderson and Frank McClung of McClung & Anderson, Brooksville, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

From the record we find evidence upon which the jury could have based its verdict for $30,000 compensatory damages on the appellee's claim for malicious interference with a business relationship. However, the evidence is legally insufficient to support the $35,000 punitive damages verdict. On this appeal appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence as to the $20,000 award for unlawful interception of a communication under the wiretapping...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases