Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On this appeal, the defendant contends that the jury's verdict acquitting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree is repugnant and inconsistent with its verdict that he was guilty of robbery in the first degree, which was based upon his use or threatened use of a knife. The defendant claims that his acquittal on the weapons count necessarily negated a required element on the robbery count because in order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
