PEONE v. REGULUS STUD MILLS, INC.

No. 16409.

744 P.2d 102 (1987)

113 Idaho 374

Roy PEONE and Janet Peone, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. REGULUS STUD MILLS, INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

October 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth B. Howard Jr. (argued), Coeur d'Alene, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles M. Dodson, Coeur d'Alene, and Joseph S. Montecucco (argued), Spokane, Wash., for defendant-respondent.


DONALDSON, Justice.

Today, we must answer the question of whether a party to a contract owes a duty of care to the employees of the other contracting party who under the contract is engaged to perform logging activities, in light of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 413 or § 416. This question is certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to I.A.R. 12.1.

The facts as contained in this certification are brief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases