DE LUCA v. KAMEROS


130 A.D.2d 705 (1987)

Nidia De Luca et al., Respondents, v. Jonathan Kameros, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 26, 1987


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The elicitation of the plaintiff Nidia De Luca's complaints to a medical expert who examined her solely in anticipation of trial was improper (see, Davidson v Cornell, 132 N.Y. 228; Nissen v Rubin, 121 A.D.2d 320). However, we conclude that the single statement to which defense counsel objected does not require reversal, as the medical experts who testified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases