Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On appeal the defendant contends that the circumstantial evidence, consisting solely of fingerprints found at the scene of the crime, was insufficient to support a guilty verdict. It is axiomatic that where a conviction is based solely on circumstantial evidence, in order for guilt to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the hypothesis of guilt should flow naturally from the facts proved and be consistent with them; and the facts...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.