1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 739 P.2d
  5. 739 P.2d 66 (1987)
 

STATE v. FINCH

85122505; CA A40914.

739 P.2d 66 (1987)

86 Or.App. 315

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Keith Leland FINCH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 8, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward L. Daniels, Albany, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

Douglas Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

YOUNG, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

On September 25, 1985, defendant was stopped by a police officer because of erratic driving. After advising defendant of his Miranda rights and conducting field sobriety tests, the officer arrested defendant for driving under the influence of intoxicants.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases