Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The determination by the respondents that the storage building that the petitioners proposed to erect on the subject property would constitute a second main building on the petitioners' premises in contravention of Huntington Town Code § 198-70 was neither illegal, arbitrary, nor an abuse of discretion, and must, therefore, be upheld (cf., Matter of Bockis v Kayser,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.