1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 106 N.J.
  5. 106 N.J. 556 (1987)
 

LINEBAUGH BY AND THROUGH LINEBAUGH v. HYNDMAN

106 N.J. 556 (1987)

524 A.2d 1255

SAMANTHA LINEBAUGH, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND NATURAL MOTHER, ANNA LINEBAUGH, AND ANNA LINEBAUGH, IN HER OWN RIGHT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HAYWORTH HYNDMAN AND SHERRY THOMPSON, DEFENDANTS, AND ADAM HONEGSTEIN AND MARYLA HONEGSTEIN, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 19, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Slimm argued the cause for appellants (Slimm, Dash & Goldberg, attorneys; Marc B. Zingarini, of counsel; Lauren H. Kane, on the brief).

Michael L. Testa argued the cause for respondents (Basile, Testa & Testa, attorneys; Richard M. Pescatore, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 213 N.J.Super. 117 (1986).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases