Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We find that the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in restoring this action to the calendar under the circumstances herein (see, CPLR 3404; McLaughlin, Practice Commentary, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, 1987 Supp Pamph, CPLR 3404, at 41; Boyle v Krebs & Schulz Motors,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.