BRADFORD v. CARDOZA

Docket No. A031136.

195 Cal.App.3d 361 (1987)

240 Cal. Rptr. 648

WILLIAM R. BRADFORD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ALBERT M. CARDOZA, as Sheriff, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

October 6, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cynda Riggins-Lewis and Donald P. Stephenson for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette and Christopher J. Wei, Deputy Attorneys General, Charles O. Lamoree, County Counsel, and Thomas H. Gordinier, Chief Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

MERRILL, J.

Appellant William R. Bradford filed a complaint for declaratory relief against respondents Albert M. Cardoza, the Solano County Sheriff, and California Attorney General John Van de Kamp. Bradford sought a declaration that he is no longer subject to possible criminal liability pursuant to Penal Code section 12021, a statute prohibiting the possession of concealable firearms by convicted felons.

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases