Martin A. and Others, by Their Mother, Aurora A., et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
George Gross, Individually and as Administrator of the New York City Human Resources Administration and as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, et al., Defendants.
Katherine Cosentino et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Cesar A. Perales, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, New York County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 27, 1987
April 27, 1987
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Marcia Robinson Lowry, Christopher Hansen and Lucy Billings for Martin A. and others, plaintiffs. Jane Greengold Stevens for Aurora A. and another, plaintiffs in Martin A. Summit Rovins & Feldesman for Pamela C. and another, plaintiffs in Martin A. Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Frederick Schaffer, Grace Goodman, Steven Mosenson and Julie O'Neill of counsel), for George Gross and others, defendants in Martin A. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Maryellen Weinberg, Robert J. Schack and Esther Furman of counsel), for Cesar A. Perales, defendant in Martin A. Ohrenstein & Brown (Mark Bunim and Laurie Burke-Weiss of counsel), for Spence-Chapin Services to Family and Children, defendant. Kalman Finkel, Arthur J. Fried, Steven Banks, Shawn P. Leary, Alan Rosner, John E. Kirklin, Helen Hershkoff, John T. McManus, Foster Maer and White & Case (Kathryn Bedke and Leslie Shad of counsel), for plaintiffs and plaintiffs-intervenors in Cosentino. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Robert J. Schack and Maryellen Weinberg of counsel), for Cesar A. Perales, defendant in Cosentino. Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Frederick P. Schaffer and Grace Goodman of counsel), for George Gross and others, defendants in Cosentino.
Supreme Court, New York County.
ELLIOTT WILK, J.
The motions in Martin and Bill A. v Gross (Martin and Bill A.) (index No. 24388/85) and Cosentino v Perales (Cosentino) (index No. 43236/85), which challenge defendants' failure to provide sufficient services to avoid the imposition of foster care placement for children, are consolidated for disposition.
The plaintiffs in ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.