1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 105 N.J.
  5. 105 N.J. 233 (1987)
 

RUFF v. WEINTRAUB

105 N.J. 233 (1987)

519 A.2d 1384

MONICA L. RUFF AND JACK H. RUFF, PLAINTIFFS-REPONDENTS, v. DAVID M. WEINTRAUB, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EMANUEL WEINTRAUB ASSOCIATES, THERESA L. OGAR, AND JESSIE WILLIAMS, DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 29, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Tinker, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (W. Stephan Leary, attorneys).

Lewis Stein argued the cause for respondents (Nusbaum, Stein, Goldstein & Bronstein, attorneys).

Joseph Buttafuoco submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of respondent Monica L. Ruff in defense of the counter-claim.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

We granted certification, 104 N.J. 416 (1986), to decide whether a jury in a personal injury action should be instructed that the proper measure of damages for lost future wages is net income after taxes. Since evidence of lost income is often introduced in the form of gross rather than net wages, we must also determine whether evidence of the plaintiff's future tax liability is admissible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases