The record indicates that the court was informed during the trial that plaintiff husband had bought the apartment where he and defendant had lived together and that it constituted marital property. However, this asset was not included in the plaintiff's statement of net worth and the court did not take it into consideration in its award. Since it had been used jointly as marital home and office since 1972 and plaintiff purchased it at the "insider's" price, the market value...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.