PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals a guilty finding by the Manchester District Court (Capistran, J.) and the imposition of a fine and penalty assessment for violation of Manchester ordinance section 16-3(b) (1985). He alleges that the ordinance is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, that the district court erred in not admitting certain testimonial evidence and in basing a guilty finding upon insufficient evidence, and that the defendant was not a proper...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.