1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 744 P.2d
  5. 744 P.2d 990 (1987)
 

STATE EX REL. AFSD v. TUTTLE

TC D8507-65133; CA A40369, SC S34077.

744 P.2d 990 (1987)

304 Or. 270

STATE of Oregon ex rel Adult and Family Services Division, Respondent On Review, v. Ronald S. TUTTLE, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

October 27, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence D. Gorin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition on behalf of the petitioner on review.

John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for Respondent on Review. With him on the brief was Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

PER CURIAM.

We accepted review of this case to consider whether a ten-year statute of limitation on filiation proceedings violates Article I, section 20 of the Oregon constitution.1 For the reasons set out below, we conclude that the statute is unconstitutional. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The child seeking parental support in this case turned ten years old on February 1, 1980. At that time former ORS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases