CALLIE v. NEAR

No. 86-2880.

829 F.2d 888 (1987)

Albert S. CALLIE and Joyce M. Callie, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Bradley A. NEAR; Elizabeth R. Near; Reddington Investments, Inc.; and Ruidoso Holiday Limited Partnership, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 7, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindsay Brew, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Anthony P. Marquez, El Paso, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

Before CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge, TANG, Circuit Judge, and STEPHENS, Senior District Judge.


CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Elizabeth and Bradley Near (the "Nears") and Reddington Investment, Inc. ("Reddington") appeal the district court's decision to enforce a purported settlement agreement without first holding an evidentiary hearing to determine the existence and terms of the agreement. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

On August 31, 1984, Joyce and Albert Callie (the "Callies") filed suit in the district court against, inter alia, the Nears...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases