FOX v. OLSEN

60-85-02750; CA A38137.

741 P.2d 924 (1987)

87 Or.App. 173

Pamela Jo FOX, Appellant — Cross-Respondent, v. Bob OLSEN, Respondent — Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

September 2, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied October 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund J. Spinney, Eugene, argued the cause and filed brief, for appellant — cross-respondent.

Alexander A. Wold, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. On brief, were Paula Downing and Dwyer, Simpson & Wold, P.C., Eugene.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Petitioner appeals and respondent cross-appeals from a judgment for respondent in a filiation proceeding. Petitioner assigns as errors that the trial court granted respondent's motion for a directed verdict and excluded blood test results from evidence. Respondent assigns as error that the court failed to award attorney fees to him. ORS 109.155(4). On the appeal, we reverse; on the cross-appeal, we affirm.

We review the evidence in the light...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases