IN RE STENCEL

No. 87-1110.

828 F.2d 751 (1987)

In re Edgar L. STENCEL, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Roderick Cline, Christie, Parker & Hald, Pasadena, Cal., for appellant.

Joseph F. Nakamura, Solicitor, Fred McKelvey, Deputy Solicitor and John W. Dewhirst, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, of Arlington, Va., for appellee.

Before FRIEDMAN, NEWMAN, and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.


PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), rejecting claims 1 through 14 of Stencel patent application Serial No. 250,895 entitled "A Driver for a Lobed Collar" for failure to meet the requirements for patentability set out in 35 U.S.C. § 103, is reversed.

OPINION

The claimed invention relates to a driver that is adapted to set a joint with a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases