1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 827 F.2d
  5. 827 F.2d 718 (1987)
 

KIRKPATRICK v. J.C. BRADFORD & CO.

Nos. 86-8624 to 86-8626.

827 F.2d 718 (1987)

Suzanne KIRKPATRICK; Dorothy D. Casler and Charles H. Lindsey, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. J.C. BRADFORD & CO., Defendant-Appellee. Glenn T. SANDERS on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Leslie D. Sanders, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROBINSON HUMPHREY/AMERICAN EXPRESS, INC., and Shearson/American Express, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Tommy E. PARKER, as custodian for Kimberly M. PARKER and James L. Smith, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PAINE WEBBER GROUP, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Rehearings and Rehearings Denied October 21, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn Delk, Churchill & Ferguson, Atlanta, Ga., Kenneth A. Jacobsen, Richard D. Greenfield, Haverford, Pa., for plaintiffs-appellants in Nos. 86-8624, 86-8625.

Ames Davis, Robert E. Boston, Nashville, Tenn., for defendant-appellee in No. 86-8624.

Lloyd S. Clareman, Harvey D. Myerson, Bradley C. Twedt, Timothy J. Carey, Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey, New York City, Peter J. Anderson, Mack Young, Peterson Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees in No. 86-8625.

Brenda M. Nelson, Greenfield & Chimicles, Kenneth A. Jacobsen, Richard D. Greenfield, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs-appellants in No. 86-8626.

Richard M. Kirby, Hansell & Post, Atlanta, Ga., Robert E. Zimet, Skadden, Arpts, Slate, Meaglher & Flom, New York City, for defendant-appellee in No. 86-8626.

Before VANCE and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Rehearings and Rehearings En Banc Denied October 21, 1987.

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs in these companion cases filed certified interlocutory appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) challenging the district court's denial of class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court denied class certification in each case on the alternative grounds that the named plaintiffs were not adequate class representatives...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases