1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 836 F.2d
  5. 836 F.2d 528 (1987)
 

SNELLMAN v. RICOH CO., LTD.

No. 87-1246.

836 F.2d 528 (1987)

Donald L. SNELLMAN d/b/a Norfin, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICOH COMPANY LTD., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 31, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen Wuest, of Metzger & Shadyac, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was John Lockie, of Metzger & Shadyac, Washington, D.C.

Gerald W. Griffin, of Cooper, Dunham, Clark, Griffin & Moran, New York City, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Preston Moore and Grant L. Kim, of Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal. Of counsel were Arthur I. Neustadt and Richard D. Kelly, of Oblon, Fisher, Spivak, McClelland & Maier, Arlington, Va.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, SKELTON and BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judges.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Ricoh Company Ltd. (Ricoh) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Ingram, S.J.) dismissing Ricoh's counterclaim that Donald L. Snellman d/b/a Norfin (Norfin) breached a contract, on the ground that Ricoh had not timely moved for new trial on its counterclaim or for judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict that Norfin was not in breach. No. C-82-6188-WAI (Feb. 18, 1987). We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases