BLUM v. WITCO CHEMICAL CORP.

Nos. 86-5310, 86-5349.

829 F.2d 367 (1987)

Jaime BLUM, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, Appellants in 86-5349, v. WITCO CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Appellant in 86-5310.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided September 2, 1987.

As Amended October 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Esposito (argued), Sobel and Lyon, P.C., East Hanover, N.J., for appellees/cross-appellants.

Samuel D. Bornstein (argued), Bornstein & Sosland, P.A., Paramus, N.J., for appellant.

Before WEIS, BECKER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal and cross appeal arise out of an age discrimination suit brought by three research chemists against their former employer, Witco Chemical Corporation.1 The case was tried to a jury which found for the plaintiffs and awarded them a total of $75,057.05 in lost pension benefits under the ADEA and $15,000 for pain and suffering under the New Jersey common law doctrine of wrongful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases