DAHL v. LANESBORO STATE BANK

No. CO-86-1548.

399 N.W.2d 621 (1987)

Eldon H. DAHL, et al., Appellants, v. LANESBORO STATE BANK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 25, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Mulcahey, Petersen & Orwoll, Rochester, for appellants.

Thomas M. Manion, Jr., Herrick and Manion, Lanesboro, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and LESLIE, JJ.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellants challenge a summary judgment dismissing their claim alleging respondent charged usurious interest rates. They assert the trial court erred because respondent was limited to charging interest rates permissible under Minn.Stat. § 334.011 (1982). We affirm.

FACTS

Between January 16, 1981 and October 17, 1983, appellants Eldon H. Dahl and Jeanette M...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases