1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 394 N.W.2d
  5. 394 N.W.2d 582 (1986)
 

MOE v. SPRINGFIELD MILL. CORP.

No. C0-86-660.

394 N.W.2d 582 (1986)

Norman R. MOE, et al., Appellants, v. SPRINGFIELD MILLING CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied December 17, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul N. Muske, Springfield, for appellants.

Kenneth R. White, Gerald L. Maschka, Mankato, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and SEDGWICK and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Norman and Genevieve Moe appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their personal injury claims against Springfield Milling Corporation for dioxin poisoning traceable to a cattle feed supplement. The trial court decided the absence of an established dioxin level in humans and appellant's failure to show with reasonable medical certainty a dioxin-related injury to Moe removed all questions of material fact. We believe a causal connection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases