PER CURIAM.
The conviction and sentence from which the defendant appeals is reversed upon a holding that the trial court committed reversible error in denying the defendant's motion for mistrial when the prosecution in cross-examination of the defendant commented upon his post-arrest silence. A prosecutor's comment on a defendant's post-arrest silence is a serious constitutional violation. E.g., David v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.