KRAMER v. JENKINS

No. 86-1849.

806 F.2d 140 (1986)

Arnold I. KRAMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. O.C. JENKINS, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

November 24, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julius Lucius Echeles, Sharon C. Kramer, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner-appellant.

William F. Murphy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Anton R. Valukas, U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for respondents-appellees.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Kramer VI has arrived faster than we thought possible. The previous opinion in this sequence concluded that the Parole Commission was entitled to rely on a deficiency notice issued by the IRS in determining — for purposes of evaluating the severity of Kramer's offense — that Kramer evaded more than $300,000 in taxes. Kramer v. Jenkins, 803 F.2d 896 (7th Cir.1986) (Kramer V). We held that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases