NABOZNY v. MARSHALL

No. 84-3394.

781 F.2d 83 (1986)

William V. NABOZNY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.C. MARSHALL, Supt., Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided January 15, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William V. Nabozny, Lucasville, Ohio Pro Se.

Edward F. Marek, Federal Public Defender, Cleveland, Ohio, Donald N. Krosin, argued, for petitioner-appellant.

Christine Manuelian, Columbus, Ohio, for respondent-appellee.

Before KENNEDY and GUY, Circuit Judges, and WOODS, District Judge.


CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner raises four issues in his appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Finding no error in the District Court's disposition of any of the issues raised, we affirm.

Petitioner was convicted of aggravated murder in violation of former § 2903.01(B), Ohio Rev.Code. He has exhausted his state remedies.

Petitioner's first complaint is that the reasonable doubt instruction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases