1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 106 Wn.2d
  5. 106 Wn.2d 745 (1986)
 

STATE v. PURDOM

No. 52235-9.

106 Wn.2d 745 (1986)

725 P.2d 622

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MARTIN J. PURDOM, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 25, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hormel & Aiken, by C.E. Hormel, for petitioner.

Paul Klasen, Prosecuting Attorney, and Kenneth L. Jorgensen, Deputy, for respondent.

GOODLOE, J.

Petitioner Martin J. Purdom appeals his conviction of being an accomplice to the delivery of a controlled substance arguing error occurred by allowing the charge to be amended on the day of trial without granting his request for a continuance and error occurred by the admission of prior consistent statements. We agree, reverse the conviction, and remand for a new trial.

On May 20, 1983, the Grant County Prosecutor charged Purdom with conspiracy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases