GUILLOTTE v. WELLS

No. 17602-CA.

485 So.2d 187 (1986)

Daniel W. GUILLOTTE and Lola Mae Guillotte, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. H.W. WELLS and Annie Bell Wells, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

February 26, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Rothell, Mansfeld, for defendants-appellants.

Herman L. Lawson, Mansfeld, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before HALL, MARVIN and NORRIS, JJ.


MARVIN, Judge.

The defendant landowners (Wells et ux) appeal a judgment declaring that a "pipeline servitude" for a domestic user gas line was established across their property by acquisitive prescription in favor of the neighboring landowner (plaintiffs Guillotte et ux). The judgment also enjoins defendants from interfering with plaintiffs' use of the gas pipeline.

The trial court's judgment is clearly contrary to Nash v. Whitten,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases