1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 382 N.W.2d
  5. 382 N.W.2d 235 (1986)
 

GOODRICH v. McCANNEL

No. C9-85-1277.

382 N.W.2d 235 (1986)

Maude L. GOODRICH, Appellant, v. Malcolm A. McCANNEL, M.D., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth G. Schivone, Kenneth G. Schivone, P.A., St. Paul, Julian J. Zweber, St. Paul, for appellant.

Kevin P. Keenan, Jerome C. Briggs, Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart & Mullin, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and FORSBERG and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This appeal is from an order directing a verdict for respondent and judgment entered April 19, 1985. The trial court determined that appellant failed to establish a causal connection between certain undisclosed risks encountered during cataract surgery and appellant's ultimate loss of vision. We affirm.

FACTS

This medical malpractice case involves claims of negligent care and treatment by respondent Malcolm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases