1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 27 Ohio
  5. 27 Ohio St. 3d 7 (1986)
 

OAMCO v. LINDLEY

No. 85-1114.

27 Ohio St. 3d 7 (1986)

OAMCO, APPELLANT, v. LINDLEY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Second rehearing granted February 2, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Knepper, White, Arter & Hadden and R. Douglas Wrightsel, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and James C. Sauer, for appellee.

Murphey, Young & Smith and Joseph C. Winner, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Barber-Greene Co.

Knepper, White, Arter & Hadden and Michael P. Mahoney, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Flexible Pavements, Inc.

Per Curiam.

At issue in this case is whether the various parts of the manufacturing process are directly related to, or used in, the manufacture of appellant's product. For the reasons which follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part the board's decision.

Initially, appellant would have this court adopt the integrated plant theory. This theory views all the components of the manufacturing process as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases