U.S. v. ARONSON

No. 85-5549 Non-Argument Calendar.

781 F.2d 1580 (1986)

UNITED STATES of America and Frank M. Odom, Special Agent Internal Revenue Service, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Mitchell ARONSON, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

February 14, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel Hirschhorn, P.A., Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Elizabeth Stein, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Michael L. Paup, Chief, Appellate Sect., Charles E. Brookhart, Nancy G. Morgan, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Aronson argues on appeal that the district court erroneously concluded that the attorney-client privilege did not protect certain documents regarding the disposition of real estate and other property. We reject Aronson's argument. The district court correctly held that such documents — which by their very nature contemplate disclosure to third parties and Aronson having failed to carry his burden of proving otherwise — are not within the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases